Many people are concerned about the changes that the Common Core standards
are bringing to the public schools. The emphasis on testing is changing
educational practices. Children are spending less and less of their school day
in play, hands-on activities, and creative pursuits because of the time required
to prepare for high-stakes tests. It’s sad to see playtime and recess taken away
from even Kindergarteners. I’m seeing families become interested in
homeschooling as they look for educational alternatives that are more age
appropriate.
I’m wondering, though, if some of the same things are happening within the
homeschool community. Many of the homeschooling pioneers a generation ago
rejected the whole concept of traditional schools. Innovators like Raymond Moore
and John Holt suggested that formal education shouldn’t even begin until
children were 8 or older. They believed that children learned best when they had
a lot of time to follow their own interests and that the best education came
from reading quality books and from hands-on experiences instead of workbooks
and standardized texts. When I began homeschooling 20 years ago, it seemed that
many homeschoolers were influenced by these ideas, even if they didn’t embrace
an unschooling philosophy. I’m sure that part of the issue was that, in the
80’s, you couldn’t just go out and buy a “full curriculum,” and many publishers
wouldn’t sell to homeschoolers! This left parents piecing together curriculum
based on what their children needed, as well as using the library heavily.
Homeschooling has become more mainstream in recent years, but I am seeing an
increase in parents who are not really committed to homeschooling or may not
even have a desire to teach their children at home. Some are just escaping a
negative public school situation and their goal is to find the easiest way to
“do school.” Others are invested in their children’s education, but don’t
realize that there is any other way to learn than to work through a stack of
public school textbooks each year. They are so worried about “gaps,” that they
try to exactly replicate what the public schools are doing, sometimes adding a
Christian focus. The fact that homeschoolers often take standardized tests also
adds to the pressure to keep up.
Certainly, whatever the method of homeschooling, there is an advantage to
individual tutoring and to working at the child’s own pace. There is certainly
nothing wrong with textbooks or traditional education, but there are so many
more possibilities. Snuggling on the couch with a stack of great books, rather
than spending hours filling out workbook pages, encouraging children to explore
and create, to act out history lessons, and to experiment with science concepts
will create students who love to learn and who know how to teach themselves.
These activities may (or may not) demand more of the parents’ time and can lead
to doubts about whether you are “doing enough,” but I think the lower stress
environment and the more enjoyable school time can lead to a much greater love
of learning. And maybe some children really aren’t ready to learn to read until
they are 7 or 8 or 9.
I wonder if the fact that homeschooling is so mainstream and “easy” now with
the plethora of curricula choices available has made us think we have to choose
the “right” curriculum and work though it without really considering how our
children learn.
I wonder if imitating the public schools rather than questioning their
methods and searching for a better way is really best for our children.
What do you think?